Posted in Apple, iPad, Tech by Tony C on June 1, 2010

apple_ipad_3gI got to use an iPad yesterday for the first time and I’m now more confused about what it’s for.  OK let me clarify.  I now want one less than I thought I did.  No amount of hyperbole can disguise the fact that it is in fact an oversized iPhone and whereas many journalists and pundits see this as a slight I don’t, it’s the iPad greatest strength but also ironically it’s key flaw. 

The form factor is better than I expected and shows Apple’s slavish and justified obsession with design, if everyone else was as fanatical about aesthetics we’d certainly live in a far better looking world but also one where fewer people are prevented rather than enabled by technology.  With the OS being a scaled up version of the one millions are familiar with on the iPhone and Touch again Apple seem to have got it about as right as we can justifiably expect.  And who can argue with the apparent two million units already shipped, although I wonder how many of these are already existing iPhone, iMac or Macbook owners.  Based on the limited and statistically unsupportable  straw poll I’ve carried out it’s 100%.

The problem as I see it isn’t the device at all but Cupertino’s approach to what goes on it and how you’re forced into an Apple playground where like Number Six you know something isn’t quite right but not sure what it is.  Let’s take the promising Apple iPad Dock Connector to VGA Adapter as an example.  Now you could justifiably have concluded as I did that if I was going to do a presentation why not take take an iPad instead.  Ah but wait.  It doesn’t work like a normal VGA adaptor which simply duplicates the screen onto a larger monitor, it only displays applications or particular content Apple allows to travel down the short £25 white cable.  And let’s not get into the vice like grip on the developer community and the control over any content Apple deem unsuitable.

Oh well the £500 I don’t have will now not be spend on the Canon 550D I hadn’t intended of purchasing instead.


3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Darren said, on June 2, 2010 at 10:44 am

    I have an iPod touch, and I’m telling people it’s an iPad nano.

    I’m the same as you Tone, I wanted an iPad less after trying one. Okay, the web browsing is great, I love the instant-on factor, the e-mail is great (hooked up to Lotus Notes Traveler) and I’m very impressed by the calendar. TweetDeck is excellent and the maps are as good as on my iMac.

    However, I had the work iPad in the house for a week and rarely touched it. I just wasn’t that excited about it. Maybe if it had been my own and I’d loaded it up with apps I’d feel different. Anyways, there’s no way I’ll fork out for a 1st generation iPad, maybe a 2nd or 3rd.

  2. Rob said, on June 2, 2010 at 12:04 pm

    I think it’s almost worth it for the article reading/web browsing alone. The thing is, you can kind of do that on the iPhone (at the cost of my rapidly detiorating sight) but you can also use that as a music/podcast player (with dock or headphones) and a handy TV/movies on the train, and a twitter/facebook instant access channel. You can’t really do any of those with the ipad. It’s just that bit too big. Big screen browsing from the sofa though… I’d pay £250 for that.

    And I’d recommend you want to reluctantly not invest in a 7D. Or at least a 50D.

  3. stufforama said, on June 3, 2010 at 12:06 pm

    Agree if it was the same price point as a Netbook, my Samsung NC10 for example, I’d be there in a flash, if not actually using Flash. £250 seems fair.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: